Hand or Brain

God, Emotion and Thinking

I would like to counter a certain attitude that always seems to be prevalent in the theological world; that of God, emotion and thinking.

God loves us, sometimes he can be angry, he created us for >insert reason here< and other such sentiments.

First, let us discuss what an emotion is:

“Emotion is a complex psychophysiological experience of an individual’s state of mind as interacting with biochemical (internal) and environmental (external) influences”

If God exists, and is outside of this Universe, then he presumably has no environment, and no environmental influences, and we can rule out the possibility of him being biochemical, so it is safe to assume that God is incapable of emotion, and love, or hate us and anything else. If there is an external environment from whence he lives, and if he is indeed biochemical, then he cannot be omniscient or omnipotent, but simply a being.

We have physicists in our own little Universe wanting to create other Universes, so if they were to do so, and life is born in their new Universe, are they to be regarded as all-powerful and all-knowing Gods?

God and thinking. The application of thought, when considered objectively, is a weakness. The need of thinking arises out of an absence of total knowledge and information. One therefore does not have all the pieces of the puzzle in the act of thinking, and must come to a conclusion with incomplete information.

I am hungry, therefore I need food, so I need to go to the grocery store to buy some conveniently placed food. Hmm, but if I goto the farmers market farther away, I can get healthier food and be better off in the long term. Do I opt for convenience or health?

Thinking is a result of being an imperfect being, and therefore not the quality of a all-knowing, all-powerful God.

The Abrahamic God, that egomaniacal war criminal who sometimes loves us cannot be real. It defies logic, and even faith itself.

Much of what constitutes faith today, isn’t really faith but the selective understanding and slim pickings of certain parts of Holy Books that align with a persons predetermined knowledge, or ignorance. This is why most Christians don’t convert to Islam, even though logically, the Quran is an extension of the Bible, God’s sequel if you will and thus, the next logical progression of their faith, but that doesn’t happen.

I would love to hear from a Christian, on why they haven’t up-verted to Islam.

In the Old Testament, God destroys the entire human race save for Noah and his family and 2 of each animal, whom repopulated the world… hmm, incest… because he was grieved by our creation, when we didn’t turn out the way He wanted us too, yet he gave us the free will to do as we please. Hmm, that makes sense. Clearly, this being is not worthy of the title God, and if such a God were to exist, he would not love us, nor hate us, but be neutral in his outlook to all things under his dominion, and thus still not be the Abrahamic God.

If there is indeed a God, then He/Them are either imperfect being/s, much as we are, though perhaps far more advanced, or we have simply anthropomorphized the Universe, and gave it the name God. My money is on the latter, though the former cannot ruled be out

If you enjoyed this post. You may enjoy the following:

Does God have a God?

The Simplest Explanation of God

3 thoughts on “God, Emotion and Thinking”

  1. In response to your statement that you “would love to hear from a Christian, on why they haven’t up-verted to Islam.”:

    First make the step to believe in a form of God. Then the next interesting question would be what are the attributes of that God.

    Muslim propaganda on being the uncorrupted version of Christianity aside, there’s very little common between the God of Christianity and the God of Islam, even though both use the words “G-O-D”.

    A Christian believes in the following attributes of the person they call G-O-D:

    1. He is all-powerful. This is shared by Islam (they worship him saying “Allahu Akbar”).

    2. He is perfectly good and holy. This is partly shared by Islam. They do, however, believe they can serving G-O-D by doing evil things like murdering people in his name.

    3. He is perfectly just. This is almost completely absent in Islam. Look at the religiously-backed institutionalized injustice in every single state that follows Sharia law. If you are Muslim you have full rights. If you are not Muslim, you have a small subset of those rights. This isn’t a case of “bad people being present in all religions” – it’s specifically commanded by their holy book.

    There is another difference with regards to justice. A Christian believes that the death sentence on him is just – to be a true Christian, one must believe that he is far from perfect, and that the sentence of his destruction is just. That is why Christians believe that God, who is just, and therefore couldn’t break his own laws despite being all-powerful (#1), had to die to if he wanted to save humanity. Muslims believe that their G-O-D can arbitrarily forgive sins without paying any penalty.

    4. He is perfectly loving and merciful. Muslims do believe that the person they call G-O-D is merciful – he can forgive any sins on a whim. But it doesn’t appear that they believe in a God who loves.

    This is not attack on Islam. I respect Muslims. It is an answer to your question on why I haven’t “up-verted” to Islam.

Hit me where it hurts...

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s